Wednesday, 7 December 2016


Whites supporting Whites: the wave of the future?

by H. Millard

It was recently announced that State Senator Marty Block, (D-San Diego), started the Legislative Jewish Caucus and that this caucus will also form a political action committee to raise money for Israel-friendly candidates. Block told the press that the Legislative Jewish Caucus "isn't a religious based organization. We see this as an ethnic organization." This statement was presumably made to both forestall Muslims from starting a Muslim Legislative Caucus and also to head off complaints that the Legislative Jewish Caucus is breaching the wall between religion and state.

At any rate, the Legislative Jewish Caucus, as an ethnic/racial organization, now joins the Asian Pacific Islander Caucus, the Legislative Black Caucus and the Latino Legislative Caucus.

Tuesday, 6 December 2016


Interviewed by Ryan Andrews

The intention of this series is to provide the reader with thumbnail introductions to a variety of Alt Right personalities and their ideas. The three main questions—which are straightforward and aimed at revealing the core—will be the same for each interview. (The lightning-round questions will vary somewhat.)

The subject of this interview is James Lawrence, who is a contributing editor to this website.

Monday, 5 December 2016


Many of those of a contemporary “alternative Right” orientation blame Christianity for bequeathing the dogma of egalitarianism to the modern world. Such people claim that the attempted abolition of natural hierarchies and the destructively “leveling” momentum of democracy and campaigns of enforced “equality” derive from the Christian doctrine that all human souls are equal before God, a notion which finds its most famous formulation in the words of St. Paul from his New Testament epistle to the Galatians: “In Christ, there is neither slave nor free, Gentile nor Jew, male nor female.”

I have written elsewhere on this subject; here it will suffice to observe that in the two millennia since Jesus Christ walked the earth, social, gender, and racial hierarchies have, prior to the cultural revolutions of the last few decades, generally remained untouched.

William Shakespeare, Christendom’s greatest playwright, lived at a time of great intellectual ferment and cultural tumult, yet even in his time both Protestant and Catholic alike affirmed the prudence of continued social stratification. If all men were equal before God, this in no sense mandated any presumption of equality of title or status between individuals, cultures, races, or sexes. If the serious Christian of the Reformation era took seriously Paul’s declaration regarding the absence of distinctions between different groups of humanity, he also acknowledged the divine origin of Biblical passages commanding slaves to obey their masters and instructing wives to be subservient to their husbands.


A FB friend recently asked me to provide a definition of “political correctness.” Here’s the definition I would use...

I would define “political correctness” as the common term for the institutionalization and enculturation of progressive moral norms in such a way that their transgression generates ridicule, disproportional feelings of outrage or indignation, ostracism of the supposed offending party, an inclination towards persecution on the part of the offended, and the possible imposition of social, economic, professional, institutional, or legal sanctions against the alleged offender, perhaps accompanied by mendacity, dishonesty, hypocrisy, or double standards on the part of the offended.

Saturday, 3 December 2016


Nationalists do not like to think of identity as malleable, invented, constructed by myths, determined by personal choice, and so on. This is natural enough, because such ideas – taken to their most ridiculous extremes – are used by our anti-nationalist establishment to garland the absurd superstition of magic borders, by which non-European foreigners are conjured into "British" and "French" so as to conceal the reality of an aggressive race-replacement policy.


Greenblatt and Spencer

by Basil Benton
"The two most precious things this side of the grave are our reputation and our life. But it is to be lamented that the most contemptible whisper may deprive us of the one, and the weakest weapon of the other."~Charles Caleb Colton
It was with some trepidation that I arrived in Washington D.C. for the NPI Conference, expecting demonstrations and protests, especially since Trump had won the election. Unfortunately, between the brashness of demonstrators and the fallout from the media after the conference, little attention has been paid to its actual content. Indeed, I was eager to read Matt Forney's piece for RightOn, but this almost exclusively addressed confrontations with the demonstrators. Nevertheless, I thank him for doing so, as their "deplorable" behavior was completely ignored by the mainstream media, which managed to pick only the pits from our bowl of cherries.


The NPI logo on the hat had me fooled for a few seconds—was this an attempt to make amends for Heilgate? But this is actually an attempted "comedy" video by the publicly funded Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. The message is twofold: (1) Whites (and other races) are going to be mixed down into a deracinated beige mass, and (2) This is incredibly funny because it'll piss off Alt-Righters, ha ha!

Of course, the humour doesn't work on any level. Even if one is a White-hating leftist liberal, who fully endorses the message, the only laughter evoked is the unfunniest kind, namely the harsh cawing of derision and scorn. What it boils down to is crass, unfunny propaganda exulting in White genocide, and you, the still largely White Canadian taxpayer, is supposed to pay for it.

Thursday, 1 December 2016


Lately a chorus of admonitions has arisen amongst some in the alt-right commentariat, to the effect that that a loyal adherent to right-wing ideals ought never "punch right." 

By this, they seem to mean: If someone else who shares your essential viewpoint makes a tactical mistake or even does something that you consider to be gravely wrong, keep your negative opinion to yourself. By all means, share your concerns in private with other loyal soldiers of the cause, but defend the wrongdoer publicly because he is your comrade in arms, and because you don't want to give aid and comfort to the opposition by exposing dissension in your ranks. 

Wednesday, 30 November 2016


November was some month, with Trump winning as we had been predicting for months, and then the very controversial NPI Conference. We were already heading for another record-breaking month when the "Heilgate" incident happened, but this seemed to create even more interest in the Alt-Right and drive traffic to us. Therefore, along with all our justifiable criticisms of Richard, we should also thank him for that. We just hope that the long-term damage isn't too bad, and that the right lessons are learned. While fingers will be crossed, breaths will not be held.


In his final comment on Richard Spencer's "Heilgate," RamZPaul blows apart the frankly flimsy arguments of the "ironic Nazis," the "Never-Punch-Rightists," and the (((Stomerfags))), and in the process proves that he's more Alt-Right than ever. Welcome back, RamZPaul!

Tuesday, 29 November 2016


Following the death of Fidel Castro, there have been some kind things said about him by people on the Alt-Right. This often happens when Third World leaders opposed to America die, and, y'know, I get it. But we should also remember that these people are not and never will be aligned with the interests of Europeans and identitarian Whites, even if they occasionally serve our purpose. This article is a slight rewrite of a piece I ran when the Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez died in 2013  
Literally unhinged: The "Great Leader" depicted using 3,000 door hinges. 

by Colin Liddell

A great man has died somewhere, apparently. And, although White nationalists, radical traditionalists, and decent people in general are not supposed to break down in tears, we are – so it seems – supposed to at least sniffle a little bit and look vaguely dewy-eyed. All because this ‘great man,’ this titan of our age was – let me get this straight – an enemy of the enemy of the second cousin of our ex-wife’s enemy, or something like that.

Monday, 28 November 2016


Richard Spencer. Love him or hate him, or lukewarm water him? Richard Spencer, say it in a sing-song voice to the melody of "Under Pressure." Say it three times while looking in the mirror in a darkened room and suddenly he appears.

Indeed, Richard Spencer seems to be ubiquitous as of late; a portentous, well-mannered, troll-smiling "whyte supreeeeemacist" whose whack-a-mole publicity tour is making national headlines and whose reverberations reach into the highest offices of the land - Richard Spencer is unavoidable. And it is precisely this notoriety that will propel the Movement forwards.

Sunday, 27 November 2016


Ya don't say?
In this latest "Nameless" podcast, Andy Nowicki considers the breaking scandal of #pizzagate, viewed in the context of the Lugenpress's recent hysterical crusade against "fake news." 

Andy considers the media and political elite's frantic efforts to censor, ban, or otherwise shut up researchers who are uncovering some majorly disquieting truths concerning various top-tier Washington operatives and their apparent crimes and depravities, possibly extending even to the commission of  widespread abuse of children. 


Americans are fine. No problem. They might lose their jobs for being Alt-Right, but they have a constitutional right to free speech and bear arms, so not much else can go wrong. And, let's face it, American antifa are mainly frustrated gay mime artists working as baristas and unwashed females with colourful armpit hair. It is quite a different matter in Europe, where you can be thrown in jail for all manner of subjectively determined thought crimes and where the antifa, while on the decline, are still capable of considerable violence.

So, spare a thought for Millennial Woes, who, following the unfortunate spin the media was able to put on the latest NPI conference, is now the subject of a witch hunt by elements of the Scottish and UK media.

Saturday, 26 November 2016


In November of 1876, one hundred and forty years ago, Johannes Brahms’ monumental First Symphony was first heard, performed in Karlsruhe, Germany.  The much anticipated work – which took Brahms over 20 years to complete – has become part of the canon of Western music. Ironically, the premiere of The Ring by Brahms’ supposed rival and fellow musical genius, Richard Wagner, was performed for the first time in the same year.

While one critic initially called Brahms’ First Symphony “Beethoven’s Tenth,” it has surpassed that unjust description and now stands on its own merit as a distinct masterpiece.  The First Symphony, the three that followed, and the rest of Brahms’ works makes him more than Beethoven’s successor, and a unique musical figure in his own right.